Skip to main content
· 1/23/1997

Woralak Kalyawongsa Udo Liell, Philip P. Durand E. Michael Morris, Attorneys-Appellees v. Margaret Jean Moffett

Citations

  • 105 F.3d 283
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1157
  • 1997 WL 22627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “attorneys’ fee arrangements are contracts under state law,” although federal courts have an interest in “fee disputes that are related to the main action”
  • noting that contingent-fee contracts “are especially deserving of judicial supervision”
  • where plaintiff contested reasonableness of defendant attorney's fees, plaintiff waived attorney-client privilege as to communications with another attorney who simultaneously represented plaintiff in same transaction
  • “Resolution of related fee disputes is often required to provide a full and fair resolution of the litigation.”
  • “[T]he federal court’s interest in fully and fairly resolving the controversies before it requires courts to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over fee disputes that are related to the main action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Engel, Merritt, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.