· 1/23/1997
Woralak Kalyawongsa Udo Liell, Philip P. Durand E. Michael Morris, Attorneys-Appellees v. Margaret Jean Moffett
Citations
- 105 F.3d 283
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1157
- 1997 WL 22627
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “attorneys’ fee arrangements are contracts under state law,” although federal courts have an interest in “fee disputes that are related to the main action”
- noting that contingent-fee contracts “are especially deserving of judicial supervision”
- where plaintiff contested reasonableness of defendant attorney's fees, plaintiff waived attorney-client privilege as to communications with another attorney who simultaneously represented plaintiff in same transaction
- “Resolution of related fee disputes is often required to provide a full and fair resolution of the litigation.”
- “[T]he federal court’s interest in fully and fairly resolving the controversies before it requires courts to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over fee disputes that are related to the main action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Engel, Merritt, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.