Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 3/5/2008
Ex Parte Thompson
Citations
- 273 S.W.3d 177
- 2008 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 328
- 2008 WL 696476
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Court of Criminal Appeal's original jurisdiction for writs of habeas corpus under the Texas Constitution allows it to review orders of contempt entered by district courts
- holding that the Court of Criminal Appeal’s original jurisdiction for writs of habeas corpus under the Texas Constitution allows it to review orders of contempt entered by district courts
- “Yates establishes, as a matter of due process, that only one contempt occurs” when witness refuses to answer question and consistently maintains that position
- when oral pronouncement of sentence and written judgment vary, oral pronouncement controls and written judgment can be corrected via nunc pro tunc
- when oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment vary, the oral pronouncement controls and written judgment can be corrected via nunc pro tunc
- when oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment vary, the oral pronouncement controls and written judgment can be corrected via nunc pro tunc
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hervey, Keller, Price, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Holcomb, Cochran, Meyers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re ReeceTexas Supreme Court· 2011-05-27· cited 330×
- Ex Parte ReedCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-12-17· cited 301×
- In re McCannCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-11-20· cited 247×
- Ex Parte AlbaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-06-09· cited 49×
- In re SpriggsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-08-07· cited 37×
- Rowe v. Superior Court, Judicial District of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-12-09· cited 32×
- In Re KusterTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2012-03-12· cited 27×
- Ryan v. RosenthalTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-04-20· cited 15×
- State v. PoseyTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2009-10-20· cited 15×
- Ex parte ReposaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-11-15· cited 1×
- in Re Coy ReeceTexas Supreme Court· 2011-05-27
- Geoffrey David Beiser v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-11-26
- Damon Earl Lewis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-11-16
- Barry Alexander and Gwen Conkleton v. the Housing Authority of the City of New BostonTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-03-09
- Charles Hugh Firth v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-06-23
- Raffaele M. Pandozy v. Mary Ann BeatyTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-03-14
- State v. Cody Joe PoseyTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2009-10-20
- Reed, Ex Parte RodneyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-12-17
- Alba, Ex Parte John AvalosCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-06-09
- Reposa, Ex Parte AdamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-10-28
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ex Parte MaddingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-03-06· cited 421×
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-11-25· cited 222×
- Ex Parte RenierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-01· cited 147×
- State Ex Rel. Wilson v. BriggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1961-11-29· cited 120×
- Ex Parte DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-12-18· cited 113×
- Ex Parte MoorehouseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-04-22· cited 90×
- Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-07-15· cited 76×
- United States v. CostelloSecond Circuit· 1952-11-10· cited 48×
- Ex Parte EuresteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-12-23· cited 39×
- Ex Parte RamseyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-09-15· cited 21×
- Ex Parte HernandezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-10-12· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.