Ex Parte Capital U-Drive-It, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that restriction on public access to judicial records may originate from “the court’s inherent power to control its own records and supervise the functioning of the judicial system”
• finding an order appealable because it was a final order, but discussing the immediate appealability of interlocutory orders disclosing confidential information
• finding an abuse of discretion occurs when the circuit court's ruling is based on a factual conclusion that lacks evidentiary support
• finding the absence of proof supporting a factual finding essential to the ruling constitutes an abuse of discretion
• \The determination of whether a party may immediately appeal an order issued before or during trial is governed primarily by [section 14-3-330 of the South Carolina Code (2017)].\
• \The phrase 'involving the merits' is narrowly construed in modern precedent.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).