Everts v. Sushi Brokers LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, without an admission by the decision-maker 28 that his actions were based on discriminatory animus, a plaintiff much show a nexus between the actions and a superior’s discriminatory remarks
• “[D]irect evidence requires 26 an admission by the decision-maker that his or her actions were based on the prohibited animus.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).