Everts v. Sushi Brokers LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that, without an admission by the decision-maker 28 that his actions were based on discriminatory animus, a plaintiff much show a nexus between the actions and a superior’s discriminatory remarks
• “[D]irect evidence requires 26 an admission by the decision-maker that his or her actions were based on the prohibited animus.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
• First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.
  Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 5,431×
• Taylor v. List
  Ninth Circuit· 1989-07-17· cited 2,764×
• Dothard v. Rawlinson
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 1,095×
• Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-01-02· cited 917×
• Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez
  Supreme Court· 2003-12-02· cited 600×
• Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 449×
• International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1991-03-20· cited 411×
• Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-04-28· cited 349×
• Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Criswell
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-17· cited 239×
• Devon Shelley v. Pete Geren
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-01-12· cited 154×
• Frank v. United Airlines, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-06-21· cited 153×
• Leah Rosenfeld v. Southern Pacific Company, a Delaware Corporation, Leah Rosenfeld v. Southern Pacific Company, a Delaware Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1971-06-01· cited 147×
• Evelyn Bodett, Wife David Bodett, Husband v. Coxcom, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-04-26· cited 117×
• Dalia Rashdan (Mohamed) v. Marc Geissberger
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-08-26· cited 40×
• United States v. Norman D. Carter, Cecilia P. Carter
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-07-03· cited 37×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Boeing Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-04-06· cited 29×
• Day v. LSI Corp.
  D. Arizona· 2016-03-29· cited 28×