· 8/26/2014
Dalia Rashdan (Mohamed) v. Marc Geissberger
Citations
- 764 F.3d 1179
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 16486
- 2014 WL 4194090
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the McDonnell Douglas framework applies to Title VI disparate treatment claims
- explaining that the same legal framework applies to Title VI and Title VII disparate treatment claims
- joining the other circuit courts of appeals that have applied the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework to disparate treatment claims under Title VI
- joining the other circuit courts of appeals that have applied the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework to disparate treatment claims under Title VI
- adopting the McDonnell Douglas framework for Title VII disparate treatment claims to Title VI disparate treatment claims and collecting cases doing the 5 same
- applying McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework to disparate treatment claims 2 20-15319 under Title VI
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKeown, Clifton, Ezra
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.