Evelyn Bodett, Wife David Bodett, Husband v. Coxcom, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the ACRA is “generally identical” to Title VII and that Title VII case is persuasive in the interpretation of ACRA
• noting that \false accusations alone\ are typically \not enough to constitute an intentional infliction of emotional distress\
• explaining that Title VII claims and ACRA claims are generally treated identically, and applying McDonnell Douglas to a disparate- treatment religious-discrimination claim
• noting that a “party cannot create a dispute of fact by simply questioning the credibility of a witness”
• stating that a “genuine dispute of material fact exists where a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party” (citation 4 omitted)
• asserting that “[circumstantial evidence] must be ‘specific’ and ‘substantial’ in order to create a triable issue with respect to whether the employer intended to discriminate on the basis of [a prohibited ground].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).