Heideman v. South Salt Lake City

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the movant “must show that the injury complained of is of such imminence that there is a clear and present need for equitable relief”
• holding that the movant “must show that the injury complained of is of such imminence that there is a clear and present need for equitable relief’
• noting that a preliminary injunction will not issue without a showing of “a clear and present need for equitable relief to prevent irreparable harm.” (emphasis added) (citation omitted)
• noting that determination of irreparable harm requires consideration of \the specific character of the First Amendment claim\
• holding movant “must show that the injury complained of is of such imminence that there is a clear and present need for equitable relief”
• holding movant “must show that the injury complained of is of such imminence that there is a clear and present need for equitable relief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).