Schrier v. University of Colorado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a mandatory injunction “places the issuing court in a position where it may have to provide ongoing supervision to assure the nonmovant is abiding by the injunction.”
• holding that plaintiff’s request to be reinstated to employment position was a mandatory injunction
• explaining that an injunction alters the status quo if it requires a change from the “last peaceable uneontested status existing between the parties before the dispute developed”
• noting that \[t]he purpose of a preliminary injunction is not to remedy past harm\
• explaining that a mandatory injunction “places the issuing court in a position where it may have to provide ongoing supervision to assure the nonmovant is abiding by the injunction”
• stating that such injunctions “must be more closely scrutinized to assure that the exigencies of the case support the granting of a remedy that is extraordinary even in the normal course” (quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).