Skip to main content

Estes v. State

Citations

  • 546 S.W.3d 691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, in an as-applied constitutional challenge, the challenger bears the burden of producing evidence “specifically demonstrating that the law in question is unconstitutional as applied to him”
  • noting that in as-applied constitutional challenge to statute, challenger bears burden of producing evidence “specifically demonstrating that the law in question is unconstitutional as ‘applied to him’” (emphasis added)
  • stating that “an ‘as-applied’ challenge ‘requires recourse to evidence’”
  • “The particular facts and circumstances that inform—and limit—our ruling today are that Estes is a married man convicted of sexually assaulting a child.”
  • “Above all, a court should spurn any attempt to turn rational-basis review into a debate over the wisdom, eloquence, or efficacy of the law in question.”
  • “Above all, a court should spurn any attempt to turn rational- basis review into a debate over the wisdom, eloquence, or efficacy of the law in question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.