Rodriguez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• State not required to show actual bigamy; evidence that defendant was married to another was sufficient
• State not required to show actual bigamy; evidence that defendant was married to another was sufficient
• State not required to show actual bigamy; evidence that defendant was married to another was sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Senn, Michael Ray
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2020-04-29
• Rodriguez, Abel Diaz
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2020-04-29
• Lopez, Rito Gregory Jr.
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2020-04-29

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Brooks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-10-06· cited 6,365×
• Arteaga v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-06-07· cited 146×
• Moore, Jammie Lee
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-06-20· cited 78×
• Liverman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-09-23· cited 66×
• In the Interest of K.M.S.
  Texas Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 56×
• Estes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2018-05-09· cited 54×
• Senn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2017-01-12· cited 5×