ESPN, Inc. v. Quiksilver, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that the elements to state a claim under New York law mirror those required to state a claim under the Lanham Act
• indicating that the elements to state a claim under New York law mirror those required to state a claim under the Lanham Act
• indicating that the elements to state a claim under New York common law mirror those required to state a claim under the Lanham Act
• indicating that the elements to state a claim under New York law mirror those required to state a claim under the Lanham Act
• allegations that consumers recognized and associated a brand as “originating from [the defendant]” supported the proposition that defendant’s mark was distinctive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).