Skip to main content
· 10/8/2010

Rindfleisch v. Gentiva Health Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 752 F. Supp. 2d 246
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107919
  • 2010 WL 3980182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Courts commonly use internet mapping tools to take judicial notice of distance and geography.” (collecting cases)
  • “[T]he Court does not view this factor as particularly significant given the technological age in which we live, where there is widespread use of, among other things, electronic document production.”
  • “[T]he Court does not view this factor as particularly significant given the technological age in which we live, where there is widespread use of, among other things, electronic document production.”
  • “The [c]ourt takes judicial notice of the fact that Auburn, New York is located in the Northern District of New York, and Kinston, North Carolina is located in the Eastern District of North Carolina.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joseph F. Bianco

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.