Skip to main content
· 9/22/2010

Escher v. BWXT Y-12, LLC

Citations

  • 627 F.3d 1020
  • 189 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2190
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19734
  • 93 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,002
  • 2010 WL 4024951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “no evidence of disparate treatment” where a plaintiff failed “to show that the other employees’ acts were of comparable seriousness to his own infraction” (quotation omitted)
  • “Protected status is a motivating factor if a truthful employer would list it, if asked, as one of the reasons for its decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sutton, McKeague, Jonker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.