Chism v. Mid-South Milling Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s complaints that defendant failed to comply with the Internal Revenue Code were insufficient to support a TPPA claim
• listing examples of clearly defined public policies which may warrant the protection provided by a retaliatory discharge remedy
• listing examples of clearly defined public policies which may warrant the protection provided by a retaliatory discharge remedy
• describing retaliatory discharge as an important but narrow exception that cannot be allowed to “consume” the employment-at-will doctrine
• “When the Court is dealing simply with allegations of pleadings . . . the Court is not free to construct additional facts or allegations.”
• “When the Court is dealing simply with allegations of pleadings, . . . the Court is not free to construct additional facts or allegations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).