E.S. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where a mental health patient had been released, the court concluded that an appellate ruling would not affect the former patient's eustodial status and no exception to mootness existed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Paige v. State
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-10-18· cited 14×
• People ex rel. Vivekanathan
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2013-10-24· cited 9×
• In re Unnamed
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-02-09· cited 9×
• State v. Curry
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2009-08-19· cited 3×
• Paige v. State of Vermont, Condos, Secretary of State, and Obama
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-10-18
• Fairlee v. Forcier Aldrich & Associates
  Vermont Superior Court· 2019-01-14

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re P.S.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-08-08· cited 66×
• State v. J.S.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2002-12-16· cited 28×
• State v. Condrick
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1984-04-27· cited 23×
• State v. O'CONNELL
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1978-02-07· cited 19×
• State v. Gundlah Ex Rel. Smallheer
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-04-02· cited 12×
• In Re PCB File No. 92.27
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-01-16· cited 10×
• In re C.K.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-03-08· cited 8×
• In re C.C.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-05-27· cited 4×