Skip to main content
· 4/27/1984

State v. Condrick

Citations

  • 477 A.2d 632
  • 144 Vt. 362
  • 1984 Vt. LEXIS 479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A case is not moot when a situation is capable of repetition, yet evades review.”
  • legal disabilities as well as social stigmatization

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Billings, Hill, Underwood, Peck, Gibson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.