Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 11/4/2003

Erwin v. Potter

Citations

  • 79 F. App'x 893

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • compared to remarks made while implementing adverse employment actions, “remarks made during the regular course of business about age . . . are much more likely to be considered the kind of ‘isolated and ambiguous’ comments that do not trigger employer liability.”
  • “This circuit has provided the statement ‘I fired 4 The Supreme Court held in Bostock v. Clayton County that discrimination against a person based on their sexual orientation or gender identity is a form of unlawful sex discrimination under Title VII. 590 U.S. 644, 662 (2020

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Clay, Krupansky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.