Ericsson, Inc. v. Interdigital Communications Corporation and Interdigital Technology Corporation v. Nokia Corporation, Intervenor-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a nonparty couldn’t challenge an order as a “mistake” under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1) because its motion to intervene under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24 had been properly denied and “[t]he plain language of Rule 60(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).