Federal Circuit· 6/18/2015

Eplus, Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.

Citations

789 F.3d 1349
115 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1273
2015 WL 3772472
2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“... induced infringement requires active steps to encourage direct infringement and an ‘affirmative intent that the product be used to infringe.’ ”
“[A] continuing decree of injunc- tion directed to events to come is subject always to adapta- tion as events may shape the need.”
“Civil contempt sanctions must be set aside when the resolution of the case requires overturning the injunction on which those sanctions are based.”
“[P]reviously conferred” rights in a patent claim “have ceased to exist” when the claim is can- celed through reexamination
“[P]reviously conferred” rights in a patent claim “have ceased to exist” when the claim is can- celed through reexamination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prost, Dyk, O'Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.