Skip to main content
· 12/23/2003

Eon Laboratories, Inc. v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.

Citations

  • 298 F. Supp. 2d 175
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23534
  • 2003 WL 23119481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that where an antitrust claim was based on patent invalidity the patent misuse/patent validity distinction from Critial-Vac applied
  • finding that where an antitrust claim was based on patent invalidity the patent misuse/patent validity distinction from Critial-Vac applied
  • comparing an antitrust claim to an unjust enrichment claim under Massachusetts law
  • comparing an antitrust claim to an unjust enrichment claim under Massachusetts law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.