D. Massachusetts· 2/22/2005
In Re Relafen Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 360 F. Supp. 2d 166
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2632
- 2005 WL 418086
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Both the United States Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals have repeatedly emphasized -the important duties and . responsibilities that devolve upon,’a district court pursuant to., Rule 23(e) prior to final adjudication and settlement of a class action suit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re Relafen Antitrust LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2005-09-28· cited 37×
- In Re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationE.D. New York· 2005-03-31· cited 26×
- In Re Flonase Antitrust LitigationE.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-06-02· cited 19×
- Apple, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.W.D. Wisconsin· 2012-08-10· cited 14×
- In re Nexium (Esomeprazole) Antitrust LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2013-12-11· cited 13×
- In re Puerto Rican Cabotage Antitrust LitigationD. Puerto Rico· 2010-07-12· cited 10×
- J.E. Pierce Apothecary, Inc. v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2005-03-31· cited 8×
- Tyler v. Michaels Stores, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2015-12-09· cited 7×
- Roxane Laboratories, Inc. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-06-02· cited 1×
Cites
63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court· 1978-01-23· cited 3,039×
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court· 1961-04-03· cited 1,996×
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 1,808×
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court· 1972-01-13· cited 1,621×
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,382×
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 1,115×
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court· 1945-04-23· cited 1,028×
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-05-03· cited 953×
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court· 1985-06-27· cited 923×
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court· 1958-06-23· cited 922×
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 921×
- Wyatt v. ColeSupreme Court· 1992-05-18· cited 921×
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court· 1965-12-06· cited 902×
- In Re General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation. Jack French, Robert M. West, Charles E. Merritt, Gary Blades, Dawn and Tracey Best, Gary and Jackie Barnes, Betty Marteny, John and Mary Southands, Edmund Berning, Dale W. Plummer, Edmund and Anneta Casey, John aThird Circuit· 1995-04-17· cited 850×
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-02-20· cited 665×
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 609×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.