Enpat, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that where “plaintiffs have presented no evidence that Enpat, its counsel, or its expert performed any prefiling investigation of these products,” this lack of evidence weighed in favor of an exceptional case determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ultra-Temp Corp. v. Advanced Vacuum Systems, Inc.
  D. Massachusetts· 1999-09-27· cited 6×
• Ultra-Temp Corp. v. Advanced Vacuum Systems, Inc.
  D. Massachusetts· 2000-07-06· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lam, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1983-09-30· cited 186×
• Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. LKB Produkter AB
  Federal Circuit· 1989-12-13· cited 109×
• Haynes International, Inc. v. Jessop Steel Company
  Federal Circuit· 1994-02-25· cited 92×
• Eltech Systems Corporation and Oxytech Systems, Inc. v. Ppg Industries, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1990-05-10· cited 69×
• Herbert Judin v. The United States, and Hewlett-Packard Company
  Federal Circuit· 1997-04-03· cited 52×