Lam, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding lost profits award for future lost sales, and for the patentee’s increased promotional expenses
• affirming district court award of lost profits where the district court considered variable costs
• no abuse of discretion in fee award where record contained documentation in support of billing rates
• no abuse of discretion in fee award where record contained documentation in support of billing rates
• “Lost profits may be in the form of diverted sales, eroded prices, or increased expenses.”
• “Where, as here, the patent owner and the infringer were the only suppliers of the product, causation may be inferred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).