· 4/3/1997
Herbert Judin v. The United States, and Hewlett-Packard Company
Citations
- 110 F.3d 780
- 42 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1300
- 37 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 392
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 6310
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that these unsupported filings can have these consequences
- sanctions were appropriate under Court of Federal Claims Rule 11 due to lack of pre-filing investigation even where claims were \colorable\
- before imposing the burdens of patent litigation on an alleged infringer the patentee must ensure there is a “well-grounded basis” for the suit
- “Because we find a clear violation of Rule 11, we hold that the trial court abused its discretion in determining otherwise.”
- “Because we find a clear violation of Rule 11, we hold that the trial court abused its discretion in determining otherwise.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Archer, Plager, Schall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.