Supreme Court of Iowa· 10/21/1981
English v. Missildine
Citations
- 311 N.W.2d 292
- 1981 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1055
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that representation by private counsel does not affect a defendant’s status as an indigent and does not forbid state expenditure of funds for an expert
- holding Sixth Amendment authority for furnishing investigative services at public expense without regard to whether indigent represented by private counsel
- holding the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel included the right to a handwriting expert at state expense for an indigent defendant with privately retained counsel
- holding the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel included the right to a handwriting expert at state expense for an indigent defendant with privately retained counsel
- holding the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel included the right to a handwriting expert at state expense for an indigent defendant with privately retained counsel
- investigative services fees must be paid for indigent criminal defendant notwithstanding lack of statutory authorization if constitution requires
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reynoldson, Uhlenhopp, McCormick, McGive-rin, Schultz, Uhlen-Hopp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SchoonmakerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-01-23· cited 103×
- McNabb v. OsmundsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-01-20· cited 75×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-08-31· cited 61×
- State of Iowa v. Adam Christopher DahlSupreme Court of Iowa· 2016-01-22· cited 48×
- State v. CokerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1987-09-23· cited 45×
- State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Iowa· 1988-06-15· cited 45×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-12-14· cited 45×
- Morton v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1991-08-29· cited 40×
- State v. LeutfaimanySupreme Court of Iowa· 1998-09-23· cited 34×
- State v. HuchtingMissouri Court of Appeals· 1996-06-11· cited 27×
- Widdis v. Second Judicial District Court of Nevada Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court· 1998-12-09· cited 26×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2010-11-30· cited 24×
- Tran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-10-16· cited 14×
- Leevester Brown v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2014-12-11· cited 14×
- Robinson v. HothamCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-09-06· cited 11×
- In the Interest of C.L.C.Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2011-03-30· cited 11×
- State v. AguilarSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-10-27· cited 9×
- Johnson v. SnyderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-03· cited 7×
- State v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-04-24· cited 7×
- Duke v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2021-03-15· cited 7×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- The People v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1966-12-01· cited 106×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1979-11-14· cited 100×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1973-04-25· cited 75×
- People v. WorthyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-08-21· cited 52×
- Hulse v. WifvatSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-06-17· cited 50×
- Schmidt v. UhlenhoppSupreme Court of Iowa· 1966-02-08· cited 41×
- State v. HancockSupreme Court of Iowa· 1969-01-14· cited 27×
- United States v. Talmon Hegwood, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1977-11-10· cited 23×
- State v. McGheeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-08-28· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.