Tenth Circuit· 7/7/2017
Ellis v. Raemisch
Citations
- 872 F.3d 1064
- 2017 WL 2902033
- 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 12241
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Colo. App. R. 51.1(a) only requires a habeas petitioner to fairly present a claim to the CCA to have exhausted all available state remedies
- holding that Colo. App. R. 51.1(a) only requires a habeas petitioner to fairly present a claim to the CCA to have exhausted all available state remedies
- holding that Colo. App. R. 51.1(a) only requires a habeas petitioner to fairly present a claim to the Colorado Court of Appeals to have exhausted all available state remedies
- assuming that “the provisions of Rule 35(c)(3)(VII) at issue here satisfy the independence and adequacy criteria”
- noting that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), “prohibits federal courts from granting habeas relief to state prisoners who have not exhausted available state remedies”
- emphasizing that \a federal court may grant habeas relief only with respect to federal claims that state prisoners have appropriately exhausted by adequately presenting the substance of the claims to the appropriate state court for review\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holmes, Matheson, Moritz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Grant v. RoyalTenth Circuit· 2018-03-30· cited 209×
- Clinton Folkes v. Warden NelsenFourth Circuit· 2022-05-10· cited 140×
- Harris v. SharpTenth Circuit· 2019-10-28· cited 26×
- Johnson v. MartinTenth Circuit· 2021-07-02· cited 19×
- Newmiller v. RaemischTenth Circuit· 2017-12-18· cited 17×
- Malone v. CarpenterTenth Circuit· 2018-12-20· cited 15×
- Menzies v. PowellTenth Circuit· 2022-11-07· cited 12×
- Hobdy v. RaemischTenth Circuit· 2019-02-19· cited 9×
- Wood v. CarpenterTenth Circuit· 2018-08-09· cited 1×
Cites
60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court· 2011-01-19· cited 13,244×
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court· 1999-06-07· cited 6,799×
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 4,485×
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 4,115×
- Knowles v. MirzayanceSupreme Court· 2009-03-24· cited 2,888×
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court· 1953-02-09· cited 2,465×
- Gray v. NetherlandSupreme Court· 1996-06-20· cited 1,588×
- Rice v. CollinsSupreme Court· 2006-01-18· cited 1,140×
- Keeney v. Tamayo-ReyesSupreme Court· 1992-05-04· cited 1,094×
- People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado· 1993-05-10· cited 1,008×
- Lebere v. AbbottTenth Circuit· 2013-10-18· cited 532×
- Jonathan Wayne Nobles v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionFifth Circuit· 1997-10-28· cited 397×
- Bland v. SirmonsTenth Circuit· 2006-08-03· cited 328×
- Cargle v. MullinTenth Circuit· 2003-01-27· cited 310×
- Byrd v. WorkmanTenth Circuit· 2011-05-27· cited 281×
- Hooks v. WorkmanTenth Circuit· 2012-08-03· cited 270×
- Smallwood v. GibsonTenth Circuit· 1999-09-10· cited 260×
- Hooks v. WardTenth Circuit· 1999-07-16· cited 246×
Other cases named Ellis v. Raemisch
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.