Skip to main content

Elliott v. Elliott

Citations

  • 920 S.W.2d 570
  • 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 390
  • 1996 WL 104218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • correcting a mathematical error in the trial court’s Form 14 calculation without a remand
  • Rejecting appellant’s argument that contribution by'him for the extraordinary expenses would reduce his ability to provide for his own basic needs where appellant failed to point to anything in the record to support that argument
  • rejecting appellant’s argument that contribution by him for the extraordinary expenses would reduce his ability to provide for his own basic needs where appellant failed to point to anything in the record to support that argument
  • trial court is not restricted to income and expense statement of custodial parent in determining child’s expenses, but should consider all relevant evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ulrich, Breckenridge, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.