Supreme Court of Missouri· 12/17/1991
Weaks v. Weaks
Citations
- 821 S.W.2d 503
- 1991 Mo. LEXIS 134
- 1991 WL 270091
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that recipient of disability benefits is commonly deprived of only means of support upon becoming disabled
- “Any excess is deemed a gratuity to the extent that it exceeds the amount of support mandated by the decree.”
- excess benefits not available to satisfy arrearage accumulated prior to disability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benton, Rendlen, Blackmar, O'Malley, Covington, Robertson, Holstein, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rosenberg v. MeridaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-08-12· cited 51×
- Elliott v. ElliottMissouri Court of Appeals· 1996-03-12· cited 47×
- Malawey v. MalaweyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-06-29· cited 46×
- In Re Marriage of CowanMontana Supreme Court· 1996-11-26· cited 44×
- Pontbriand v. PontbriandSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1993-03-29· cited 33×
- Gress v. GressNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-06-11· cited 31×
- Drummond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-07-29· cited 31×
- Adams v. AdamsMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-07-01· cited 27×
- Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1998-06-12· cited 25×
- L.A.L. v. L.L.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-07-11· cited 21×
- J.R. v. J.R.R.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-03-24· cited 21×
- Windsor v. WindsorMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-07-12· cited 20×
- Farr v. CloningerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-01-30· cited 20×
- In Re Marriage of GilmoreMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-05-02· cited 18×
- Welker v. WelkerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1995-07-18· cited 17×
- Child Support Enforcement Agency v. DoeHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1999-12-01· cited 15×
- In Re Marriage of LindhorstSupreme Court of Missouri· 2011-08-30· cited 14×
- Bottorff v. BottorffMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-05-10· cited 14×
- Pacana v. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. PacanaAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-07-25· cited 13×
- Meyer v. BlockMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-12-30· cited 13×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Andler v. AndlerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1975-07-17· cited 89×
- Chase v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court· 1968-08-01· cited 76×
- Horton v. HortonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1963-07-03· cited 66×
- Binns v. MaddoxCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1976-02-18· cited 65×
- Children & Youth Services of Allegheny County v. ChorgoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-04-19· cited 65×
- Cohen v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-06-12· cited 61×
- Potts v. PottsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-04-14· cited 59×
- Board v. BoardKentucky Supreme Court· 1985-04-11· cited 45×
- McClaskey v. McClaskeyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1976-11-16· cited 36×
- Mooneyham v. MooneyhamMississippi Supreme Court· 1982-10-27· cited 33×
- Schulze v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court· 1974-02-07· cited 31×
- Hanthorn v. HanthornNebraska Supreme Court· 1990-09-28· cited 30×
- M v. MMissouri Court of Appeals· 1958-05-06· cited 26×
- Bowden v. BowdenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1983-01-26· cited 26×
- Folds v. LebertLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1982-09-30· cited 24×
- Craver v. CraverSupreme Court of Missouri· 1983-04-26· cited 23×
- In Re Estate of NakaertsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1982-04-29· cited 19×
- State Ex Rel. Division of Family Services v. RubleMissouri Court of Appeals· 1985-01-22· cited 14×
- Hepton v. HeptonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-01-22· cited 13×
- Arnoldt v. ArnoldtNew York Supreme Court· 1990-04-06· cited 12×
Other cases named Weaks v. Weaks
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.