Skip to main content

Elledge v. State

Citations

  • 911 So. 2d 57
  • 2005 WL 1355024

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that twenty-five years on death row does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment
  • rejecting defendant’s Brady violation claim, finding, in part, that defendant failed to demonstrate that State suppressed disputed evidence because disputed evidence was mentioned several times during pre-trial depositions and trial
  • \[T]he record does not support the contention that Elledge was denied an adequate mental evaluation as required by Ake. \
  • “[A]ny substantive claim pertaining to juror misconduct is procedurally barred as it could have and should have been raised on direct appeal.”
  • “Elledge’s contention that he is innocent of the death penalty was decided adversely to Elledge on direct appeal and is not cognizable in the postconviction proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.