· 8/12/2010
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Gottstein
Citations
- 617 F.3d 186
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16680
- 2010 WL 3168649
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a “protective order, like any ongoing injunction, is always subject to the inherent power of the district court” and “might be thought of as a form of injunction in . . . particular setting[s]” (internal quotation marks omitted
- proper to file under seal documents containing “trade secrets and confidential commercial information of defendant Lilly; revelation has the potential to impinge on the company’s privacy and property rights and inflict commercial harm.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ak
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.