In Re: Criminal Contempt Proceedings Against Gerald Crawford and Michael Warren United States of America v. Gerald Crawford and Michael Warren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a TRO, extended for good cause pending resolution of preliminary injunction proceedings was a valid basis for appellants’ contempt convictions
• explaining that a preliminary injunction is distinguished from a TRO by “notice and an opportunity for a hearing”
• noting that TRO extended beyond the time limit of Rule 65(b) is treated as preliminary injunction
• noting that where a TRO extends beyond the time limits set forth in Rule 65 pending a district court’s ruling on substantive motions, the TRO is considered a preliminary injunction subject to appellate review but still binding on parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).