EEOC v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Missouri Supreme Court Rules of Professional Conduct do not apply to non-lawyers
• finding when former employees have not filed a charge of discrimination nor sought EEOC representation, the EEOC is thus acting on its own authority and not as the aggrieved parties’ representative
• “[T]here is nothing that prohibits one party to a litigation from making direct contact with another party to the same litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2002-01-15· cited 1,129×
• Cobell v. Norton
  D.C. Circuit· 2003-03-03· cited 2×
• Greenwood Trust Co. v. Michael E. Hurley
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-12-19
• Greenwood Trust Co. v. Hurley (In re Hurley)
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-12-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Massiah v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
• General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
  Supreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 1,072×
• Unnamed case
  First Circuit· 1985-01-31· cited 131×
• Bauman v. Jacobs Suchard, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 1990-11-09· cited 14×
• In re Federal Skywalk Cases
  W.D. Missouri· 1983-01-04· cited 9×