Skip to main content
E.D. Missouri· 11/14/1996

EEOC v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

Citations

  • 960 F. Supp. 203
  • 1996 WL 865390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “ ‘pattern- or-practice’ employment discrimination cases are routinely bifurcated” (citation omitted)
  • “At the damages trial, the question is whether the individual class members are entitled to relief.”
  • “[A] given individual’s right to monetary relief at the remedial phase of this lawsuit cannot properly be determined now, on Dial’s motion for summary judgment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Limbaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named EEOC v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.