Cobell v. Norton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering Rule 12(f) motion to strike plaintiffs’ response to defendant’s historical accounting plan
• considering Rule 12© motion to strike plaintiffs’ response to defendant's historical accounting plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pigford v. Veneman
  D.C. Circuit· 2005-01-03· cited 9×
• Hildebrandt v. Veneman
  D.C. Circuit· 2005-12-16· cited 5×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Massiah v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 3,189×
• United States v. Michael Lemonakis, United States of America v. Paul Enten
  D.C. Circuit· 1973-10-15· cited 165×
• United States v. Winston Massiah, Mitchell Anfield, Leonard Royal Aiken and Icky Thorn
  Second Circuit· 1962-07-27· cited 117×
• Miano v. AC & R Advertising, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1993-02-25· cited 27×
• EEOC v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
  E.D. Missouri· 1996-12-12· cited 10×
• Cobell v. Norton
  District of Columbia· 2002-09-17· cited 10×