Skip to main content

Edwards v. State

Citations

  • 558 S.W.2d 452
  • 1977 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that it was unnecessary for court to address whether court's instructions placed undue duress and pressure on jury, but calling attention to coercive jury instruction given in Duke
  • stating that it was unnecessary for court to address whether court's instructions placed undue duress and pressure on jury, but calling attention to coercive jury instruction given in Duke
  • the purpose of Article 36.27 is to afford a defendant and his attorney an opportunity to examine the questions and to urge objections, if any, to the additional instructions or answers to be given to the jury
  • jury note stating \We are hung\
  • jury note stating \We are hung\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Douglas, Odom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.