Stanton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an instruction that a mistrial would have to be declared is not, of itself, coercive
• an instruction that a mistrial would have to be declared is not, of itself, coercive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Martinez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2003-10-23· cited 93×
• Sanchez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-06-21· cited 69×
• Sanchez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2005-10-12· cited 49×
• Edwards v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-11-09· cited 27×
• Freeman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-08-15· cited 27×
• Rodela v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1984-02-23· cited 11×
• Boyd v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-11-12· cited 5×
• Joshua Freeman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-08-15
• John Eric Trevino v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2007-10-10
• David Ruben Salazar v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2007-10-10
• David Ruben Salazar v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-01-23
• Alberto Lopez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-08-24
• Hairston, Jermont Martez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-04-20
• Kristopher Donald Mixon v. State
  Texas Supreme Court· 2015-08-04