Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 2/28/1989

Edwards v. Gilbert

Citations

  • 867 F.2d 1271
  • 1989 WL 15750

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that mere verbal taunts, despite their distressing nature, directed at inmate by jailers do not violate inmate’s constitutional rights
  • noting that taunts, even those that are “distressing” do not violate a prisoner’s constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment
  • noting that mere verbal taunts, despite their distressing nature, directed at inmate by jailers do not violate an inmate’s constitutional rights
  • noting that verbal taunts, alone, are insufficient to state a constitutional violation
  • finding verbal taunts directed at an inmate, even if they are distressing, do not deprive the inmate of constitutional rights
  • “The law does not require jail officials to keep up with the latest literature in the social sciences.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Gibson, Tjoflat

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Edwards v. Gilbert

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.