Skip to main content
· 1/7/1992

Randy James Barber, Administrator of the Estate of Kenneth Robert Barber, Deceased v. City of Salem, Ohio

Citations

  • 953 F.2d 232
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 109
  • 1992 WL 782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the Eighth Amendment rights of prisoners are analogous to pretrial detainees’ due process rights” and applying the Eighth Amendment “deliberate indifference” standard to conduct toward detainee
  • noting that “the Eighth Amendment rights of prisoners are analogous to pretrial detainees’ [due process rights]”
  • observing that “[a] pretrial detainee does not enjoy protection of the Eighth Amendment”
  • holding failure to comply with state law is not evidence of deliberate indifference
  • discussing how pretrial detainees’ right are analyzed under the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause and are completely analogous to the Eighth Amendment rights of prisoners
  • adopting the holding of Popham v. City of Talladega, 908 F.2d 1561, 1563-64 (11th Cir. 1990)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Milburn, Engel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.