S.D. Indiana· 11/18/1998
Edmond v. Goldsmith
Citations
- 38 F. Supp. 2d 1016
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18899
- 1998 WL 842330
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that both parties “stress the primary purpose of the roadblocks as the interdiction of narcotics” and that “[t]he IPD has made it clear that the purpose for its checkpoints is to interdict narcotics traffic”
- noting that both parties \stress the primary purpose of the roadblocks as the interdiction of narcotics\ and that \[t]he IPD has made it clear that the purpose for its checkpoints is to interdict narcotics traffic\
- treating the moving party’s likelihood of success on the merits as the \threshold issue\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court· 1988-01-20· cited 9,468×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 1,275×
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 1,188×
- United States v. Montoya De HernandezSupreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 982×
- Chandler v. MillerSupreme Court· 1997-04-15· cited 524×
- Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1993-10-12· cited 393×
- Mary Beth G. v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 1983-11-29· cited 328×
- United States v. Osvaldo Rodriguez-MoralesFirst Circuit· 1991-03-27· cited 206×
- United States v. Joseph Noel SealsFifth Circuit· 1993-03-24· cited 182×
- Platinum Home Mortgage Corporation v. Platinum Financial Group, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 1998-08-18· cited 178×
- Moran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-12-12· cited 151×
- United States v. Adela Morales-Zamora, United States of America v. Javier Ozuna-Fuentes and Jose Manuel Morales-DiazTenth Circuit· 1990-09-06· cited 147×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.