Eddings v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trainable mentally retarded defendant with I.Q. of 49 who was highly suggestible held not to have waived his rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kuenzel v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-06-29· cited 336×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1998-04-03· cited 93×
• Henry v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-12-11· cited 89×
• Noah v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-05-27· cited 14×
• Cardwell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-05-26· cited 9×
• Eddings v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-08-16

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Costello v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1956-04-01· cited 1,814×
• Redwine v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1952-11-20· cited 52×
• Dover v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1969-10-20· cited 40×
• Hines v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-03-18· cited 30×
• Garrett v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1979-03-09· cited 29×
• Hines v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1980-06-20· cited 25×
• People v. Langston
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-01-27· cited 23×
• Terry v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-12-28· cited 16×
• Ervin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-10-04· cited 5×