Eclaire Advisor Ltd. v. Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In this day and age of rapid transportation and instant communications, the convenience of immediate physical proximity to documents, testimony, and other proof has become of less consequence to a forum non conveniens analysis ... “
• \New York has an 'especially strong' interest in applying its law when one of its domiciliaries alleges that it has been defrauded.\ (quoting Advanced Portfolio Techs., Inc. v. Advanced Portfolio Techs. Ltd. , No. 94 Civ. 5620, 1999 WL 64283 , at (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 1999)
• calling these types of inferences “badges of fraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).