Snyder v. Snyder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the purpose of spousal maintenance is to provide for a party’s needs, not to create a profit-sharing plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Eckert v. Eckert
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-04-05· cited 24×
• Marriage of Kampf v. Kampf
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-06-12· cited 21×
• Jendrusch v. Jendrusch
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1981-02-17· cited 18×
• Renz v. Renz
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1977-08-18· cited 18×
• In RE MARRIAGE OF: LUTZKE v. Lutzke
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-01-31· cited 9×
• Waxler v. Dalsted
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-02-28· cited 4×
• John Justice v. Holly Justice
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2001-02-23
• Cornell v. Unknown Heirs of Mary Walik
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-11-14
• In re Estate of Zenor
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-06-18

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kaiser v. Kaiser
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-04-30· cited 68×
• Gau v. Hyland
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-02-17· cited 46×
• Kiesow v. Kiesow
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-03-05· cited 44×
• Wilson v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1890-06-02· cited 17×
• Larkin v. Larkin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-01-05· cited 13×
• Leutgers v. Kasten
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-01-26· cited 5×
• Wos v. Wos
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-11-12· cited 5×