Skip to main content
· 2/18/2004

Vennard v. State

Citations

  • 803 N.E.2d 678
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 234
  • 2004 WL 302295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that convictions for murder and robbery constituted double jeopardy where the robbery was elevated to a Class A felony based on the same serious bodily injury, i.e. death, that was used to establish the murder conviction
  • holding that defendant's convictions for both murder and robbery elevated to a Class A felony violated common-law rules against double jeopardy where the evidence of serious bodily injury was used to elevate the robbery conviction and to support murder conviction
  • reducing conviction for Class A felony robbery to Class B felony robbery to remedy double jeopardy conviction where jury was instructed on Class B felony robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Najam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.