Eccles v. National Semiconductor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting prior . version of Rule 4(m) that provided for a 120-day window

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hammad v. Tate Access Floors, Inc.
  D. Maryland· 1999-01-06· cited 35×
• Randolph v. Hendry
  S.D. West Virginia· 1999-05-11· cited 23×
• Nahigian v. Leonard
  D. Massachusetts· 2002-11-22· cited 21×
• Henderson v. Claire's Stores, Inc.
  D. Maryland· 2009-04-08· cited 15×
• G.G.G. Pizza, Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1999-08-11· cited 13×
• Lawrence v. Hanson
  W.D. Virginia· 2002-04-22· cited 9×
• Carden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
  S.D. West Virginia· 2008-09-05· cited 7×
• Reed v. Cagan
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-10-29· cited 6×
• Rogers v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689
  District of Columbia· 2015-03-23· cited 3×
• West v. Abendroth & Russell Law Firm
  N.D. Iowa· 2014-09-16· cited 2×
• Rice v. Alpha Security, Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 2013-04-16· cited 2×
• Kramer v. Jotun Paints, Inc.
  D. Maryland· 2002-02-12· cited 1×
• Wolfe Cycle Sports, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.
  D. Nebraska· 2005-04-28