Skip to main content
· 5/11/1999

Randolph v. Hendry

Citations

  • 50 F. Supp. 2d 572
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7532
  • 1999 WL 320871

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Article 1 of the Hague Convention provides that its terms apply “in all cases ... where there is occasion to transmit a judicial or extrajudicial document for service abroad”
  • collecting authority holding that service is proper within 120 days after removal, not 120 days from filing in state court
  • “When no defendant has been served, in an action removed to federal court from state court, Rule 4(m
  • “When no defendant has been served, in an action removed to federal court from state court, Rule 4(m
  • “Because Canada does not object to service by postal channels, service of process by mail is authorized in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.