· 5/11/1999
Randolph v. Hendry
Citations
- 50 F. Supp. 2d 572
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7532
- 1999 WL 320871
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that Article 1 of the Hague Convention provides that its terms apply “in all cases ... where there is occasion to transmit a judicial or extrajudicial document for service abroad”
- collecting authority holding that service is proper within 120 days after removal, not 120 days from filing in state court
- “When no defendant has been served, in an action removed to federal court from state court, Rule 4(m
- “When no defendant has been served, in an action removed to federal court from state court, Rule 4(m
- “Because Canada does not object to service by postal channels, service of process by mail is authorized in this case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.