Nahigian v. Leonard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]t is unclear what the court meant by this [statement], other than that the Crawford decision occurred on a motion for summary judgment, while the Vartanian decision occurred on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss.”
• “the purpose of Section 150’s administrative requirement, rather than giving potential defendants notice and an opportunity to conciliate, seems to be to give the Attorney General notice that a crime [failure to pay wages] may be occurring”
• “the purpose of Section 150's administrative requirement, rather than giving potential defendants notice and an opportunity to conciliate, seems to be to give the Attorney General notice that a crime [failure to pay wages] may be occurring” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lipsitt v. Plaud
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-08-12· cited 58×
• Depianti v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-06-17· cited 49×
• Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-04-17· cited 25×
• Miara v. First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance
  D. Massachusetts· 2005-06-16· cited 24×
• Healthtek Solutions, Inc. v. Fortis Benefits Insurance
  E.D. Virginia· 2003-05-19· cited 10×
• In Re Lernout & Hauspie Securities Litigation
  D. Massachusetts· 2004-09-08· cited 7×
• LaLonde v. Textron, Inc.
  D. Rhode Island· 2006-03-01· cited 7×
• Eggert v. Merrimac Paper Co., Inc. Leveraged Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust
  D. Massachusetts· 2004-03-31· cited 3×
• Rodrigues v. Genlyte Thomas Group LLC
  D. Massachusetts· 2005-09-29· cited 3×
• Evans v. Akers
  D. Massachusetts· 2006-12-06· cited 2×
• Filler v. Lernout
  D. Massachusetts· 2004-09-08· cited 2×
• Source One Financial Corp. v. Dinardo Auto Sales LLC
  D. Connecticut· 2014-03-03
• Ng v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
  D. Massachusetts· 2016-02-03

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
  Supreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
• Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 6,595×
• Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.
  Supreme Court· 1999-05-17· cited 3,295×
• Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor
  Supreme Court· 1987-04-06· cited 3,207×
• Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida
  Supreme Court· 1974-01-21· cited 915×
• IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Herrmann
  Second Circuit· 1993-11-19· cited 531×
• Ralph M. Nowak, Administrator of the Estate of Sally Ann Nowak v. Tak How Investments, Ltd., D/B/A Holiday Inn Crowne Plaza Harbour View
  First Circuit· 1996-09-20· cited 328×
• Tatro v. Manor Care, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-01-13· cited 315×
• My Bread Baking Co. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1968-02-05· cited 301×
• Patriot Cinemas, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp.
  First Circuit· 1987-11-24· cited 247×
• Ollie LATTIMORE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. POLAROID CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
  First Circuit· 1996-11-05· cited 237×
• Danca v. Private Health Care Systems, Inc.
  First Circuit· 1999-08-02· cited 235×
• Vartanian v. Monsanto Company
  First Circuit· 1994-02-03· cited 231×
• Unnamed case
  First Circuit· 1992-03-30· cited 222×
• Roland C. Dubois and Restore: The North Woods v. United States Department of Agriculture, and Loon Mountain Recreation Corporation
  First Circuit· 1996-12-19· cited 210×
• Harris v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-06-07· cited 122×
• LaRocca v. Borden, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2002-01-08· cited 86×
• Mira v. Nuclear Measurements Corp.
  Seventh Circuit· 1997-02-14· cited 78×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 2000-03-28· cited 63×
• Carol A. Ward, D.C. v. Alternative Health Delivery Systems, Inc. Physicians Consultant & Management Corporation
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-08-22· cited 61×