District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 12/24/2003

Ebron v. United States

Citations

838 A.2d 1140
2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 755
2003 WL 23018831

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “the purpose behind the contemporaneous objection rule” is for a party to “put the court on notice of the objection, the reason for it, and the relief sought”
requiring that threat be issued by or on behalf of defendant
“Evaluating and weighing evidence for relevance is within the trial court‟s discretion.”
defendant Ebron, while on trial for murder, communicated with courtroom spectators to issue threat to witness
threatening gestures to eyewitness who saw preparations to commit murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wagner, Farrell, Washington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Ebron v. United States

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.