Skip to main content

Eberhardt v. State

Citations

  • 359 S.E.2d 908
  • 257 Ga. 420
  • 1987 Ga. LEXIS 891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding expert testimony proper as to whether a mentally ill victim was capable of distinguishing fact from fiction
  • where State shows a pattern of ongoing occurrence of abuse, defendant cannot claim surprise if “every date of alleged abuse was not specified in the indictment”
  • where State shows a pattern of ongoing occurrence of abuse, defendant cannot claim surprise if “every date of alleged abuse was not specified in the indictment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clarke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.