Skip to main content
· 9/26/1984

Edgehill v. State

Citations

  • 320 S.E.2d 176
  • 253 Ga. 343
  • 1984 Ga. LEXIS 938

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • testimony that jewelry and clothes found on the victims were articles belonging to them, together with forensic expert’s conclusions based on dental records, held sufficient to identify the victims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.