Skip to main content
· 6/2/1981

Eberhard Manufacturing Co. v. Baldwin

Citations

  • 628 P.2d 681
  • 97 Nev. 271
  • 1981 Nev. LEXIS 506

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a court may inform a jury why its verdict is inconsistent and send the verdict back for further deliberation
  • a court may inform a jury why its verdict is defective and send the jury back for additional deliberation
  • policy considerations favor the correction of any errors or irregularities in a verdict at the trial level, prior to the discharge of the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manoukian, Gunderson, Batjer, Springer, Mowbray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.